The grant, which will cover five years, represents a significant uplift to the funding granted to iDSI in 2015 and will allow us to continue working relationships with policymakers and healthcare payers to understand and respond to the challenges they face – whether ensuring the financial sustainability of a health insurance fund or fair access to good quality care across public health facilities.

This next phase of iDSI will see stronger emphasis on Sub-Saharan Africa with iDSI’s flagship countries including Kenya and Ghana, where global health funders will be departing and domestic health care spending is on the rise. Additionally, many Sub-Saharan African countries are currently introducing national health insurance or coverage plans and making important decisions about what health services and technologies should be included in Universal Health Coverage (UHC) offerings, where value for money considerations could make a huge difference in health outcomes.

As a result of the renewed funding, iDSI’s global network of expertise is expanding – we’re pleased to report iDSI core partners now include: the Asia Health Technology Assessment consortium which includes the National Health Foundation of Thailand, the Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program; the Health Economics Research Unit of the KEMRI Wellcome Trust Programme, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health and the Clinton Health Access Initiative, Inc.,in addition to current core partners: the Global Health and Development Group at Imperial College London, the China National Health Development Research Center and the Center for Global Development.

The network endeavours to generate long-term, locally-owned solutions to health care challenges through building capacities for using evidence in policy and clinical decisions. Its impact to date includes influencing policy in eight countries – China, India, Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam, South Africa, Tanzania, and Ghana – where there has been tangible progress toward national institutions being established to embed value-for-money into decision-making about what medicines, vaccines or other health services should be offered to the population, and how these could be procured in the most cost-effective way. Already iDSI has supported Tanzania to prioritise its Essential Medicines List from 500 to 400 drugs, reducing spending on poor value items and freeing up resources to improve access to the most cost-effective medicines, trained Kenya’s Health Benefits Package Committee on measuring the added value of a new health intervention compared to existing ones, piloted a local quality improvement initiative with hospital staff in Vietnam to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for pneumonia and brought together more than 100 policy makers, academics and industry representatives working across Sub-Saharan Africa for a special event to share knowledge and best practices.

iDSI Director Kalipso Chalkidou, a Professor of Global Health Practice at Imperial College London who also directs the Global Health program at the Center for Global Development, said: “With government and aid budgets under pressure, many developing countries are facing declines in health funding and are going to have to make difficult choices. Policymakers’ decisions about what health care to make available and at what cost can be a life or death decision for people across the developing world. We will inform these critical decisions with data and evidence that maps out how best to spend limited funds to improve outcomes and save lives.”

Chinese, Thai, Norwegian, and British governments have backed iDSI, which also receives funding from the Department for International Development, the UK government department responsible for administering overseas aid.

Amanda Glassman, Chief Operating Officer at the Center for Global Development, said: “Previous health care decision making in developing countries has too often been driven by inertia and lobbying rather than science, economics, ethics and the public interest. We want to change that.”

Ira C. Magaziner, Chief Executive Officer of the Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc (CHAI), said: “Low- and middle-income countries are set to make great strides toward universal health coverage in the coming years, ensuring that all people have access to affordable and quality care. CHAI works with governments that are implementing health financing and service delivery reforms to meet this goal. We are excited to deepen our collaboration with the iDSI network to help partner governments set health care priorities, drawing on iDSI’s expertise and years of experience across different country settings.”

Trygve Ottersen, Executive Director at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, said: “Without proper support, it is hard for decision-makers to navigate within the broad and ambitious agenda of the Sustainable Development Goals and to make evidence-informed choices that are both fair and efficient. iDSI serves as a unique platform for supporting the most critical choices on the path to UHC and the Institute is delighted to be part of this partnership.”

Professor Teo Yik Ying, Dean of the Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health at the National University of Singapore, said: “The Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health at the National University of Singapore is delighted to be a contributing partner to iDSI. The mission of iDSI to support evidence-based decision making in global public health is aligned to the mission of the School, with the aim of translating research discoveries to improve the health of global communities.”

Dr Somsak Chunharas, from the National Health Foundation of Thailand, said: “Being an organisation promoting evidence-based policy and system development in Thailand for the last 30 years, the National Health Foundation looks forward to this opportunity to share and learn from various countries’ context in establishing the mechanism and tools for evidence-informed policy.”

iDSI was borne out of the recommendations of the Center for Global Development’s Priority-Setting Institutions for Global Health Working Group in 2012.

The US capital was the setting for three days of meetings and events to mark UHC Day and the release of ‘What’s In, What’s Out: Designing Benefits for Universal Health Coverage’.

IDSI’s time in DC kicked off with a Global Health Initiatives meeting attended by representatives from the Gates Foundation, World Bank, Givewell, the Center for Global Development (CGD), PRICELESS South Africa, the UK Department for International Development (DFID), Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), the Joint Learning Network (JLN), Tufts Medical, Disease Control Priorities (DCP), the Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) and Gavi the Vaccine Alliance.

During the meeting iDSI, CHAI, JLN, NIPH and Tufts Medical Centre showcased their initiatives and the concentration of their work including their successes, focus countries and potential future opportunities.

Amanda Glassman

Attendees then heard from Global Development Funders’ representatives: David Wilson from the Gates Foundation, Julia Watson from DFID, James Snowden from GiveWell, Adrien de Chaisemartin from Gavi, Naina Ahluwalia and Somil Nagpal from World Bank and Yosuke Kobayashi from JICA; with all agreeing each partner group is carrying out valuable efforts in the bid to expand and improve healthcare globally.

Tuesday 12 December was the celebration of UHC Day around the world. A sold-out event at the CGD offices saw presentations from iDSI Director Professor Kalipso Chalkidou, CGD Chief Operating Officer Amanda Glassman, Professor Karen Hofman from PRICELESS, Waranya Rattanavipapong from HITAP, iDSI Board chair Professor Tony Culyer and a keynote speech by Dr Mark McClellan.

Copies of ‘What’s In, What’s Out’ were available for attendees to take away and Amanda Glassman explained how the creation of an explicit health benefits plan is an essential element in creating a sustainable system of UHC. With limited healthcare budgets comes tough decisions for policymakers, along with the many facets of governance, institutions, methods, political economy and ethics that are needed to decide what’s in and what’s out in a way that is fair, evidence-based, and sustainable over time.

Dr Mark McClellan

At the heart of Dr Mark McClellan’s keynote address was opportunities for greater value for healthcare spending – specifically, the ‘accountable care’ model, which sees providers held jointly accountable for the cost and quality of care for a defined population of patients.

Dr McClellan, a doctor and economist, said: “There is more healthcare can do than ever before, however this means rising costs in healthcare. The value of healthcare can be improved by developing and implementing evidence-based policy solutions.”

The importance of sharing data and creating interoperability to understand health outcomes within an accountable care system was also put forward by Dr McClellan, who provided Nepal as an example of success in utilising remote personal health tools, telemedicine and lower-cost sites of care: “In Nepal a simple process of patients’ texting in information can result in a visit to their homes by community care workers and a potential prescription of antibiotics. Investment in these modest but effective interventions can also gather useful metrics in the form of electronic health records. We need to move from ‘siloed’ data to data that provides intelligence about our populations.”

Waranya Rattanavipapong

HITAP’s Waranya Rattanavipapong presented on building research capacity for UHC in Southeast Asia and told of how analysis by HITAP revealed Indonesia could save 90% of its insulin budget. Waranya said: “Indonesia has a current budget of $18 million per year for insulin. Tens of millions more than necessary is being spent on modern insulins to treat diabetes despite evidence cheaper products work just as well. Our analysis revealed switching from insulin analogue to human insulin and negotiating to Thai prices ($2 for human insulin and $9 for insulin analogue, compared to $20 for human insulin and $22 for insulin analogue in Indonesia) could save 90% of the budget.”

Professor Karen Hofman detailed the strides South Africa has taken towards promoting the health of the population by passing a bill to implement a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. Professor Hofman, who proudly sported an ‘I am #sweetenough’ t-shirt supporting the sugar tax, focused on fiscal levers in South Africa and the positive impact they have had in the past: “After the increase in the excise tax on cigarettes, sales reduced between 1993-2009 by one third and per capita consumption decreased by 50%. With 25% of teenage girls in rural areas overweight in South Africa, the time is now for translating evidence on sugar to policy. There will inevitably be push-back from various sources but the passing of the bill, which will be implemented in April 2018, is a powerful step forward.”

Professor Karen Hofman

Professor Tony Culyer rounded up the event and took to the stage to emphasise iDSI’s objectives to help low- and middle-income countries to transition from aid, develop skills to spend smarter and to increase access to quality healthcare so they can achieve UHC: “Our aim is to give LMICs capacity to produce policies that will have an impact of health. We wish to leave behind an endowment of expertise for LMICs to build better worlds for themselves.”

A recording of the ‘Better Decisions, Better Health: Practical Experiences Supporting UHC from around the World’ event is available on the CGD website (1 hour 32 minutes).

UHC Day, commemorated each 12 December, is the anniversary of the first unanimous United Nations resolution calling for countries to provide affordable, quality healthcare to every person, everywhere. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, that all UN Member States have agreed to, try to achieve UHC by 2030. This includes financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all.

Professor Tony Culyer

Read the blog here.

Seminar resources can be found here.

The book What’s In, What’s Out: Designing Benefits for Universal Health Coverage is due out in the summer.

The workshop narrative derived from the global need to develop UHC as a way to improve health, expressed in the SDG 3.8 “achieve universal health coverage (UHC), including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all”. The basis for the workshop was a document published by CGD on priority setting in health (1).

This 3 day workshop had the overall objective of scope out the content and process for developing guidance on HTA as a tool for reimbursement decisions. A specific deliverable at the end of the workshop was a document outlining:

1. Key issues that need to be tackled in the guidance
2. Insights and learnings from participants that can inform each of these issues, including where possible, identification of  “landmark”  documents and  countries examples of good/bad practice
3. Recommendations for research or data collection on information gaps.

The participants were invited based on their involvement in the Health Technology Assessment (HTA)/priority setting process in their respective countries, and a distinction was made between countries in different levels of development of HTA/priority-setting system (established or working towards UHC). There were representatives from South Africa, Chile, Thailand, the UK, the United States, the Philippines, Croatia, Norway, Switzerland, and other countries. The participants present worked in a wide range of organisation: HTA research – University of Wits and Indonesia, HTA agencies – NICE and HITAP, the Ministry of Health – Zambia, Chile and Vietnam, regional HTA networks EUnetHTA and HTAi, and global funders – BMGF, the UK DFID, GAVI and the Global Fund.

Over the three days, the participants listened to, participated in and prepared sessions on: the scope of work of an HTA mechanism; how are countries setting up HTA mechanisms; legal frameworks for HTA mechanisms; minimum capacities for HTA mechanisms; the role of regional and global partners and networks; criteria to be used at different stages of the HTA process and monitoring the effectiveness of HTA mechanisms. Alongside these sessions, breakout groups discussed questions as: steps and principles for HTA processes; what are the main considerations in landscape/context/mandate analysis and criteria and negative/positive lists of implementing HTA.

The workshop was a success, with a strong interest from the WHO to collaborate with iDSI in future work. IDSI and the WHO are discussing next steps, and there has been a strong interest from the participants to participate in the development of this document.

The agenda for the workshop is here

The whole blog post can be found here 

Read her full blog post here.